PDA

View Full Version : Iraq deployments could drop to 9 months



bobdina
07-21-2010, 06:11 PM
Iraq deployments could drop to 9 months

By William H. McMichael - Staff writer
Posted : Wednesday Jul 21, 2010 15:37:01 EDT

U.S. planners in Iraq are considering cutting troop unit deployments from 12 months to as low as nine months some time after the force falls to the 50,000 mark, the top U.S. commander there said Wednesday.

“I think nine months would be reasonable,” Army Gen. Ray Odierno said during a Pentagon news conference. But he cautioned that there is no certainty such a change will take place during the period between September and Dec. 31, 2011, by which time all major U.S. military units must be withdrawn.

“What we have to do is sustain a certain level through the end,” he told reporters at an earlier breakfast meeting. “We’re still working through that.”

Odierno said the plan now is to remain at the 50,000 level through next summer, at which time the force, following a command reassessment, would begin drawing down to zero over the following four months.

The trick is determining how to maintain the balance of skills that will continue to be required in Iraq as force levels fall, he said.

After his staff reviews the concept, the command will produce recommendations that Odierno will then run by the Joint Staff and Army officials.

“If we can do it, we will do it,” Odierno said.

The staff is considering changes only to unit deployment lengths, and the change would only affect Army units, as no Marine units remain in Iraq. Individual augmentees, he said, would “probably stay” at 12-month tours.

After December 2011, only limited U.S. personnel, such as weapons system trainers and embassy liaisons, will continue to be assigned to Iraq, Odierno said.

While Marine Corps unit tour lengths never changed from the standard seven months, the Army three years ago was forced to impose 15-month tour lengths for active-duty troops as the Pentagon struggled with growing violence in Iraq that threatened to upend coalition efforts to stabilize the country.

Although U.S. forces are not performing independent combat patrols — Odierno said advisers accompany Iraqi patrols, with U.S. logistical support — a force of 50,000 needs to stay in place for another 12 months to help the new Iraqi government stabilize, to continue to train and advise Iraqi Security Forces, and to help with transitioning the mission to the U.S. Embassy as the State Department takes full control of the U.S. engagement with Iraq.

Odierno said he is “very pleased” with the progress of the ongoing drawdown, which has seen U.S. forces assigned to Iraq fall from 145,000 in January 2009 to today’s 70,000. At the height of the surge, in 2007, the U.S. had 608 facilities in Iraq; that figure is now 112. The goal is to fall to 94 by Sept 1.

And over the past year, the command has sent away about 40,000 wheeled vehicles, roughly half of which went to Afghanistan, and 1.2 million other pieces of gear over the last six to eight months, he said.

“That has gone very, very smoothly,” Odierno said.

Odierno said it is “unclear” when the last troops will be deployed to Iraq before the scheduled final pullout.

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2010/07/army_iraq_nine_month_deployments_072110w/

MickDonalds
07-22-2010, 12:03 AM
Leave it at 12 months. I'd rather stay here a full year than an odd "9 month" period. Same with A'stan