Video: AK47 VS TANK SYRIA ???

[USARMY999]

http://www.apacheclips.com/boards/vbtube/upload/thumb/172_3898.jpg (http://www.apacheclips.com/boards/vbtube_show.php?tubeid=2287) ONLY IN SYRIA LOLhttp://www.apacheclips.com/boards/vbtube/images/play_thread.png (http://www.apacheclips.com/boards/vbtube_show.php?tubeid=2287)

[holck]

Hahaha nice one :)

[jeweetzelluf]

They watched the bridge part of Saving Private Ryan?

[USARMY999]

lool

[BrendenF11]

Certainly looks like they took out the DSHK with those shots, I hope that was their intention. If not they wouldn't stand much of a chance.

[blackout23]

They take the silly machine gun out. Tank takes the camera man, the gunner and the entire fucking building out. Seems like a good plan.

[laxaddict992]

Not a DSHK its a Kord heavy MG. Much more powerful. IF they indeed took it out thats a good job for $3 worth of 7.62 ammo

[Clodius]

Such tactics were taught to us in the early '80's. Small arms fire will take out vision ports and other sensitive equipment. In the days before dual warheads we were told to shave off reactive armor with .50 cal. The only thing wrong with this video is the deployment of a tank in a built up area. A tank without supporting infantry in such scenarios is a dead tank.

[JosefStalin]

He probably took out the MG but they should have ran after that.

[atrox6661]

Destroyed the commanders weapon and his view ports, tanks too close to do much about it and no infantry support means hes fucked unless he gets out of there fast RPG's are probably too close to detonate.

[alejandro6505]

There was not a hand Granade to throw? ... No RPG? this was the opportunity of a great video !!. SHHHhh... Fck....and much better ... 4 SAA less ... :hb: