PDA

View Full Version : 11 New York Infants Infected With Herpes After Circumcision



ErisKillton
09-01-2012, 01:21 PM
11 New York infants infected with herpes through ritual in Jewish circumcision





The practice of "oral-genital suction" performed during some Orthodox Jewish circumcision ceremonies could leave the infant with a potentially fatal herpes virus infection, health officials warn.

New York City and federal health authorities issued a public advisory Thursday cautioning against the sucking practice because it has been linked to 11 infants becoming infected with the herpes simplex virus type 1 since 2000. Ten of the infected newborns were hospitalized, two developed brain damage and two died, the health officials said.

A newborn can become infected when the adult performing the circumcision places his mouth on the circumcision wound to siphon blood away from the cut. The ritual is only embraced by a handful of sects within the Orthodox Jewish community, according to New York City Health Commissioner Dr. Thomas Farley.

"There is no safe way to perform oral suction on any open wound in a newborn," Farley said in a news release. "Parents considering ritual Jewish circumcision need to know that circumcision should only be performed under sterile conditions, like any other procedures that create open cuts, whether by mohelim [the circumciser] or medical professionals."

A report on the infections also appears in the June 8 issue of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

Almost 80 percent of adults carry the herpes simplex virus type 1, which is usually spread orally through common activities and is different from the sexually transmitted type 2 version of the virus. The common cold sore is a typical sign of infection with the herpes simplex virus type 1, but most people don't know they are infected because they have no history of symptoms, officials said.

In six of the 11 circumcision cases, health care providers confirmed that the suction ritual had taken place, although there was evidence of a connection in the other five cases. The ritual more than tripled the risk of infection among newborns getting circumcised, the CDC report stated.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2012/06/08/11-new-york-infants-infected-with-herpes-through-ritual-in-jewish-circumcision/#ixzz25EuhMWJE


uh....gross.

BrendenF11
09-01-2012, 02:58 PM
What the fuck. Well I learned of a new tradition today I guess, one I certainly will not participate in.

Clodius
09-01-2012, 03:51 PM
Fucking savages...

eaglethebeagle
09-01-2012, 07:46 PM
What the hell is wrong with foreskin? I wish I had mine still.

jamieooh
09-01-2012, 07:56 PM
eagle the second article eludes to foreskin being restored.

Circumcision is the removal of the foreskin, which is the skin that covers the tip of the penis. In the United States, it is often done before a new baby leaves the hospital. There are medical benefits and risks to circumcision. Possible benefits include a lower risk of urinary tract infections, penile cancer and sexually transmitted diseases. The risks include pain and a low risk of bleeding or infection.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) does not recommend routine circumcision. Parents need to decide what is best for their sons, based on their religious, cultural and personal preferences.


Main Top Stories Food The Green Man Fatabase 2.0 Mind & Body Profiles in Health Practitioners

AAP's endorsement of male circumcision undercut


By Dr. Paul D. Tinari, Vancouver Sun September 1, 2012



The new AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics) circumcision guidelines have everything to do with politics and very little to do with medicine. The AAP, shocked by plummeting circumcision rates and rapidly falling profits for its membership, had to do some-thing dramatic to stem the tide.

The AAP did do a review of 1,000 published articles, but it is extremely difficult to publish research that has uncovered circumcision harm.

Moreover, it is virtually impossible to have investigations looking into negative impacts of circumcision funded in the first place.

For example, the first MRI studies of the adverse impacts of circumcision pain on the infant brain had to be carried out by unpaid researchers who were then unable to publish their results in the open medical literature. The most fundamental question when examining the efficacy of any surgical procedure is how it impacts a patient's life expectancy. Yet no such research has ever been published on circumcision, the most common surgical procedure in North America.

The AAP's claim that amputating the only movable part of the penis "does not appear to adversely affect" sexual function is like saying removing the wheels does not appear to affect the functionality of an automobile.

Any man who has had his foreskin restored knows that the AAP doesn't know what they are talking about.

Dr. Paul D. Tinari Coquitlam
© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/health/endorsement+male+circumcision+undercut/7178838/story.html#ixzz25GYgFAj3

eaglethebeagle
09-01-2012, 11:00 PM
My ding dong aint getting cut on by no one. I would like to get a penis reduction because my left knee is getting chaffed so much.:evilgrin0039:

Sixx
09-02-2012, 12:50 PM
Chicharrón NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM!!
http://i45.tinypic.com/24lj5lu.jpg