PDA

View Full Version : China's Military Paper Warns US Of Armed Conflict Over Sea Dispute



jamieooh
04-22-2012, 09:15 PM
China's Military Paper Warns US Of Armed Conflict Over Sea Dispute
By Amrutha Gayathri

April 21, 2012 4:56 AM EDT
http://china.usc.edu/App_Images//south_china_sea_2.jpg

http://globalnation.inquirer.net/files/2012/04/Scarborough-Reef2.jpg

A top military publication in China has warned that the US may be risking an armed confrontation by undertaking a joint military exercise with the Philippines amid maritime tensions between Manila and Beijing over a disputed shoal in the South China Sea.

The military drills involving nearly 7,000 US and Philippine forces, which began in the South China Sea Monday, has intensified the standoff between the Philippines and China over the Scarborough Shoal, also known as the Panatog Shoal.

Although the drills, meant to improve security, are happening in a different region, to the southwest of the disputed rocky reefs, Beijing registered its protest right when it began.

Though the military newspaper commentary is different from a government caveat, it is the sternest warning from Chinese authorities yet pertaining to the territorial dispute surrounding Scarborough shoal.

"Anyone with clear eyes saw long ago that behind these drills is reflected a mentality that will lead the South China Sea issue down a fork in the road towards military confrontation and resolution through armed force," the People's Liberation Army newspaper said, according to a Reuters report.

"Through this kind of meddling and intervention, the United States will only stir up the entire South China Sea situation towards increasing chaos, and this will inevitably have a massive impact on regional peace and stability."

The Philippines pulled out a warship, replacing it with a coast guard vessel, to "de-escalate the situation" over Scarborough area off the country's northwestern coast, President Benigno Aquino III said Monday, reported the Associated Press.

Rejecting a Philippine proposal for a peaceful and diplomatic solution for the shoal dispute, China dispatched a military vessel to the South China Sea Thursday, according to report by the China Daily.

Beijing's move signals its determination to protect its maritime interests, dealing a severe blow to the Philippine call for peace.

Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Raul Hernandez Friday said that China's move was seen as an escalation of the standoff, which began April 10, when two Chinese ships thwarted the Philippines' effort to arrest several Chinese fishermen accused of illegal entry and poaching near the Scarborough area.

China's growing maritime influence in the region has neighboring nations including Brunei, Malaysia, Vietnam and Taiwan worried over territorial confrontations.

China claims almost the entire South China Sea, including what is recognized by the UN as the Exclusive Economic Zone of other neighbors, according to reports.

China asserts that the islands and waters of the South China Sea, which Manila now calls the West Philippines Sea, were first discovered in the 13th century by a Chinese emperor. Though a Chinese spokesperson recently denied historicity as the reason for the claim, he maintained that China had "indisputable sovereignty" over all the islands and waters in the South China Sea.

"China's position on the South China Sea issue is consistent and clear. China has indisputable sovereignty over islands in the South China Sea as well as their adjacent waters," China's Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hong Lei said during a press meet Feb. 29.

Analysts say South China Sea is increasingly being seen as a region akin to the Persian Gulf. "Aside from the issue of sovereignty, energy security is also a major factor behind these competing claims," veteran Filipino journalist Chito Sta. Romana wrote recently. He said the growing tensions between China and the US in the Asian region provided a "strategic context that complicates the regional situation." It was "difficult to expect an end to this diplomatic tug-of-war in the near future," he added.

eaglethebeagle
04-22-2012, 10:35 PM
We support China when we buy shit made in China. Apple and other companies that their manufacturing there are only boosting the coffers of the communist government of China. The people that work those manufacturing jobs are nearly if not at slave labor conditions. They are jumping out windows and killing themselves to simply not go to work at Foxxconn or some other factory. Americans dont think about any of this shit when they buy their iphone or ipad3. Its literally helping our enemy prepare to do war with us. Not to mention our national debt that is owned by China. Our government has been corrupt and selling us out for decades now. Used to be if it was made in China is was crap now it is still crap but you dont have many other choices now.

KGCNC
04-22-2012, 10:53 PM
Good points eagle.

brightgoo
04-22-2012, 10:55 PM
I think China's military posturing the past ... decade ... to say the least, has been very interesting.

BrendenF11
04-22-2012, 11:40 PM
I think it is simple eagle. Tax the living shit out of companies that out source more than 20% of their businesses goods, higher Tariffs, and an increase of tax breaks for american produced materials, and assembly. It would break Chinas back, increase my faith in the political parties, and give millions of Americans decent paying jobs, by bringing back the manufacturing force this country once had. Then that would lead to less profit for companies for a while, but eventually it would turn back around. In turn it would also create thousands if not millions of jobs in the US.

No politician would go for that though because those companies that outsource virtually everything they have, are the ones that are extremely high in the donations towards political campaigns.

BrendenF11
04-22-2012, 11:46 PM
Chinas military posturing is no more than soviet military posturing during the cold war, simply a test to see what they can get away with. Why would they actually act and start wars in the South Asian sea? That would destroy their economy, ours as well, and create a massive war no one wants, including the chineese.

Their ability to wage a war and maybe force others out through the nuclear option is there, but once one person fires one...... Everything goes hot, and quite frankly there is a lot of competition right now in the nuclear market. So someone fires one, every nation with nukes takes up a defensive posture, somone retaliates, their allies fire, the enemy of their allies fire, the allies of the allies who fired on their enemys fire. World gone, except SA and Africa. I don't think anyone wants that.