eaglethebeagle
04-15-2012, 03:22 PM
This was forwarded to me from my father today.
April 13, 2012
By Col. Steve Strobridge, USAF-Ret.
In reading an (already dated) article about the long-term cost of war, one sentence jumped out at me.
It cited an “unfunded liability” of $1.3 trillion (with a “t”) to provide future disability and burial benefits for veterans — and that figure didn’t include health care.
Health care costs, the writer indicated, could approach another $1 trillion over the next 40 years for Iraq and Afghanistan veterans alone.
One source cited in the article asserted, “This is another entitlement program that could break the bank …”
Pardon me while I take a deep breath …
On one hand, this is what economists do — project long-term costs of current issues. On the other, it’s a perfect illustration of how distorted the world can look when viewed through an economist’s prism.
Let’s start with the fact that these unfunded liabilities are people, not widgets.
Second, let’s recall that these unfunded liabilities acquired this distinction solely because of government orders.
Finally, assigning them to the unfunded liability bin utterly ignores the flip side of the coin: the often terrible and permanent physical, psychological, and financial liabilities incurred by the people who followed those orders — up to and including the deaths that inflict those costly burial benefits on the taxpayers.
Unfortunately, the unfunded-liability perspective almost certainly will grow more prevalent as the nation’s budget problems worsen in coming years.
Today’s amputees receive wonderfully crafted (and expensive) prostheses. When they need to be replaced years down the road, will the country still be willing to cover the cost?
Some have proposed addressing the future funding need by establishing a trust fund. But a trust fund is only a tool, not a cure.
Most existing trust funds (Social Security, Medicare, TRICARE For Life, among others) already are under attack for being unsustainable or costing too much. Further, trust funds carry with them special congressional rules that make solving any funding problems even harder.
It’s a hurtful truth that serious budget problems all too often cause government leaders to do callous things to serve short-term needs.
As stewards of those who served with us, before us, and after us, we’re obligated to call a foul on those who would reduce wounded, ill, and injured protectors of the nation to mere unfunded liabilities.
http://www.moaa.org/Main_Menu/Take_Action/As_I_See_It/As_I_See_It_2012/As_I_See_It_-_Are_You_An_%E2%80%9CUnfunded_Liability%E2%80%9D_. html
April 13, 2012
By Col. Steve Strobridge, USAF-Ret.
In reading an (already dated) article about the long-term cost of war, one sentence jumped out at me.
It cited an “unfunded liability” of $1.3 trillion (with a “t”) to provide future disability and burial benefits for veterans — and that figure didn’t include health care.
Health care costs, the writer indicated, could approach another $1 trillion over the next 40 years for Iraq and Afghanistan veterans alone.
One source cited in the article asserted, “This is another entitlement program that could break the bank …”
Pardon me while I take a deep breath …
On one hand, this is what economists do — project long-term costs of current issues. On the other, it’s a perfect illustration of how distorted the world can look when viewed through an economist’s prism.
Let’s start with the fact that these unfunded liabilities are people, not widgets.
Second, let’s recall that these unfunded liabilities acquired this distinction solely because of government orders.
Finally, assigning them to the unfunded liability bin utterly ignores the flip side of the coin: the often terrible and permanent physical, psychological, and financial liabilities incurred by the people who followed those orders — up to and including the deaths that inflict those costly burial benefits on the taxpayers.
Unfortunately, the unfunded-liability perspective almost certainly will grow more prevalent as the nation’s budget problems worsen in coming years.
Today’s amputees receive wonderfully crafted (and expensive) prostheses. When they need to be replaced years down the road, will the country still be willing to cover the cost?
Some have proposed addressing the future funding need by establishing a trust fund. But a trust fund is only a tool, not a cure.
Most existing trust funds (Social Security, Medicare, TRICARE For Life, among others) already are under attack for being unsustainable or costing too much. Further, trust funds carry with them special congressional rules that make solving any funding problems even harder.
It’s a hurtful truth that serious budget problems all too often cause government leaders to do callous things to serve short-term needs.
As stewards of those who served with us, before us, and after us, we’re obligated to call a foul on those who would reduce wounded, ill, and injured protectors of the nation to mere unfunded liabilities.
http://www.moaa.org/Main_Menu/Take_Action/As_I_See_It/As_I_See_It_2012/As_I_See_It_-_Are_You_An_%E2%80%9CUnfunded_Liability%E2%80%9D_. html