jamieooh
03-23-2012, 10:54 AM
Mar. 20, 2012 - 02:02PM |
By KHURRAM SHAHZAD, Agence France-Presse
ISLAMABAD — Pakistani lawmakers demanded an American apology and taxes on NATO convoys in recommendations put to parliament March 20 in a key step towards repairing a major crisis in relations with the U.S.
Parliament will debate the recommendations next week in a probable precursor to reopening NATO supply lines into Afghanistan suspended for nearly four months and to putting the Pakistani-U.S. alliance on a more pragmatic footing.
Islamabad closed its Afghan border to NATO after U.S. airstrikes killed 24 soldiers in November, plunging relations with Washington to an all-time low after Pakistan was humiliated by a U.S. raid that killed Osama bin Laden in May.
Pakistan was incensed by the American refusal to apologize for the Nov. 26 killings and besides shutting its border, ordered U.S. personnel to leave a base reportedly used in America’s drone war against al-Qaida and the Taliban.
But the anger has dissipated and experts expect the alliance to be re-crafted along more pragmatic lines involving fewer U.S. drone strikes against Islamist militants in Pakistan and hopes of Pakistan facilitating Afghan peace efforts.
“Pakistan wants to pursue good relations with every country. Pakistan also wants to pursue its own national interest,” Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar told reporters.
The military is considered the chief arbiter of foreign policy but many see the parliamentary debate as setting a vital precedent by consulting elected political leaders, if only to protect the military from later recriminations.
“This is the first time that the parliament of Pakistan has been given responsibility to frame foreign policy,” said Senator Raza Rabbani, head of the parliamentary committee on national security that drew up the recommendations.
The document calls the November strikes a “blatant violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty” and said Islamabad should seek “an unconditional apology from the U.S. for the unprovoked incident”.
It said “taxes and other charges must be levied on all goods importing in or transiting through Pakistan” — which experts have estimated could amount to $1 million a day — and, in a sub clause, an end to American drone strikes.
Drone strikes are resented in Pakistan as violations of sovereignty, despite the fact that they have at times worked in Islamabad’s favor, such as killing Pakistani Taliban founder Baitullah Mehsud in August 2009.
In a sign that Pakistanis are keen to put the relationship onto a clearer footing, the recommendations rule out verbal agreements with the United States and said any such agreement “should be reduced to writing immediately.”
It was a veiled reference to former military ruler Pervez Musharraf, who signed Pakistan up as an ally to the war on terror, and to revelations in leaked American cables that the government had quietly approved drone strikes.
Parliament will start to debate the recommendations on March 26, after the leader of the opposition, Chaudhry Nisar, demanded time to assess the document.
“This parliament has passed two resolutions against the drone strikes but no one listened to it. What is the guarantee that there will be no back-tracking on this resolution?” Nisar said.
The recommendations backed peace and reconciliation efforts in Afghanistan saying there was “no military solution” to the Afghan conflict.
The United States has called on Pakistan to play a constructive role in nascent peace efforts in Afghanistan, where its support is considered vital given its history of relations with Taliban insurgents.
Pakistan has long accused the United States of taking its support in the war for granted and the parliamentary panel called on the international community to recognize the country’s “colossal human and economic losses”.
It said Pakistan was committed to fighting terror and indicated that foreign boots on Pakistani soil were a red line — despite the bin Laden raid and occasions in which U.S. forces have crossed the border from Afghanistan.
The United States sent its condolences over the November air strikes, but stopped short of an apology. NATO expressed regret over what it called a “tragic unintended incident.”
By KHURRAM SHAHZAD, Agence France-Presse
ISLAMABAD — Pakistani lawmakers demanded an American apology and taxes on NATO convoys in recommendations put to parliament March 20 in a key step towards repairing a major crisis in relations with the U.S.
Parliament will debate the recommendations next week in a probable precursor to reopening NATO supply lines into Afghanistan suspended for nearly four months and to putting the Pakistani-U.S. alliance on a more pragmatic footing.
Islamabad closed its Afghan border to NATO after U.S. airstrikes killed 24 soldiers in November, plunging relations with Washington to an all-time low after Pakistan was humiliated by a U.S. raid that killed Osama bin Laden in May.
Pakistan was incensed by the American refusal to apologize for the Nov. 26 killings and besides shutting its border, ordered U.S. personnel to leave a base reportedly used in America’s drone war against al-Qaida and the Taliban.
But the anger has dissipated and experts expect the alliance to be re-crafted along more pragmatic lines involving fewer U.S. drone strikes against Islamist militants in Pakistan and hopes of Pakistan facilitating Afghan peace efforts.
“Pakistan wants to pursue good relations with every country. Pakistan also wants to pursue its own national interest,” Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar told reporters.
The military is considered the chief arbiter of foreign policy but many see the parliamentary debate as setting a vital precedent by consulting elected political leaders, if only to protect the military from later recriminations.
“This is the first time that the parliament of Pakistan has been given responsibility to frame foreign policy,” said Senator Raza Rabbani, head of the parliamentary committee on national security that drew up the recommendations.
The document calls the November strikes a “blatant violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty” and said Islamabad should seek “an unconditional apology from the U.S. for the unprovoked incident”.
It said “taxes and other charges must be levied on all goods importing in or transiting through Pakistan” — which experts have estimated could amount to $1 million a day — and, in a sub clause, an end to American drone strikes.
Drone strikes are resented in Pakistan as violations of sovereignty, despite the fact that they have at times worked in Islamabad’s favor, such as killing Pakistani Taliban founder Baitullah Mehsud in August 2009.
In a sign that Pakistanis are keen to put the relationship onto a clearer footing, the recommendations rule out verbal agreements with the United States and said any such agreement “should be reduced to writing immediately.”
It was a veiled reference to former military ruler Pervez Musharraf, who signed Pakistan up as an ally to the war on terror, and to revelations in leaked American cables that the government had quietly approved drone strikes.
Parliament will start to debate the recommendations on March 26, after the leader of the opposition, Chaudhry Nisar, demanded time to assess the document.
“This parliament has passed two resolutions against the drone strikes but no one listened to it. What is the guarantee that there will be no back-tracking on this resolution?” Nisar said.
The recommendations backed peace and reconciliation efforts in Afghanistan saying there was “no military solution” to the Afghan conflict.
The United States has called on Pakistan to play a constructive role in nascent peace efforts in Afghanistan, where its support is considered vital given its history of relations with Taliban insurgents.
Pakistan has long accused the United States of taking its support in the war for granted and the parliamentary panel called on the international community to recognize the country’s “colossal human and economic losses”.
It said Pakistan was committed to fighting terror and indicated that foreign boots on Pakistani soil were a red line — despite the bin Laden raid and occasions in which U.S. forces have crossed the border from Afghanistan.
The United States sent its condolences over the November air strikes, but stopped short of an apology. NATO expressed regret over what it called a “tragic unintended incident.”